<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Indexing Rollercoaster.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blueverse.com/2007/09/04/googles-indexing-rollercoaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blueverse.com/2007/09/04/googles-indexing-rollercoaster/</link>
	<description>Marketing and Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Directory Era Finally Fading. - BlueVerse</title>
		<link>http://www.blueverse.com/2007/09/04/googles-indexing-rollercoaster/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>The Directory Era Finally Fading. - BlueVerse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueverse.com/xx/?p=182#comment-106</guid>
		<description>[...] the alive directory de-indexation and now the zorg-links de-indexation, one after another each one will be taken out and if things go [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the alive directory de-indexation and now the zorg-links de-indexation, one after another each one will be taken out and if things go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnet</title>
		<link>http://www.blueverse.com/2007/09/04/googles-indexing-rollercoaster/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueverse.com/xx/?p=182#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Well not quite, it depends on quality of content, in this site&#039;s case it was a trimming, first all pages that were not up to the quality level were de-indexed then the site was crawled again and re-indexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well not quite, it depends on quality of content, in this site&#8217;s case it was a trimming, first all pages that were not up to the quality level were de-indexed then the site was crawled again and re-indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word Hugger</title>
		<link>http://www.blueverse.com/2007/09/04/googles-indexing-rollercoaster/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Word Hugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueverse.com/xx/?p=182#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Would this be the same for ranking last in a zero competition name brand keyword (wordhugger), or for sites that are actually not listed at all in google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this be the same for ranking last in a zero competition name brand keyword (wordhugger), or for sites that are actually not listed at all in google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

