<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes Losing RSS Subscribers is a Good Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blueverse.com/2008/01/04/sometimes-losing-rss-subscribers-is-a-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blueverse.com/2008/01/04/sometimes-losing-rss-subscribers-is-a-good-thing/</link>
	<description>Marketing and Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:57:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Slevi</title>
		<link>http://www.blueverse.com/2008/01/04/sometimes-losing-rss-subscribers-is-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Slevi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueverse.com/2008/01/04/sometimes-losing-rss-subscribers-is-a-good-thing/#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>Very true indeed, a bit of a downside though for those blogs which write about various subjects but certain readers just being interesting in a single aspect. You could try to beat that though by releasing rss feeds based on category as well but it wouldn&#039;t be the most ideal solution since you might be risking to lose some potential readers for the other material again on the other hand.

For me it&#039;s also one of the major reasons why I don&#039;t use RSS though, blogs write about such a great variety of categories that around 80% of the average blog couldn&#039;t interest me at all even though I like some other entries. I&#039;m not interested in seeing 8 titles coming by which I wouldn&#039;t enjoy reading anyways simply to get 2 titles which I would enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true indeed, a bit of a downside though for those blogs which write about various subjects but certain readers just being interesting in a single aspect. You could try to beat that though by releasing rss feeds based on category as well but it wouldn&#8217;t be the most ideal solution since you might be risking to lose some potential readers for the other material again on the other hand.</p>
<p>For me it&#8217;s also one of the major reasons why I don&#8217;t use RSS though, blogs write about such a great variety of categories that around 80% of the average blog couldn&#8217;t interest me at all even though I like some other entries. I&#8217;m not interested in seeing 8 titles coming by which I wouldn&#8217;t enjoy reading anyways simply to get 2 titles which I would enjoy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunken</title>
		<link>http://www.blueverse.com/2008/01/04/sometimes-losing-rss-subscribers-is-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>sunken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueverse.com/2008/01/04/sometimes-losing-rss-subscribers-is-a-good-thing/#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>This makes sense.  You aren&#039;t going to please everyone.  The goal, I would imagine, would be to maintain and grow a number and not lose more than you are gaining.  It&#039;s like radio station ratings numbers.  They will rise and fall, but as long as the long term trend is upward, than all is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes sense.  You aren&#8217;t going to please everyone.  The goal, I would imagine, would be to maintain and grow a number and not lose more than you are gaining.  It&#8217;s like radio station ratings numbers.  They will rise and fall, but as long as the long term trend is upward, than all is good. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
